HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 - NB-1 - General Plan Screening Request GPS-11-04 - 2/7/2012MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2012 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN SCREENING REQUEST GPS -11-04 FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1726 SUPERIOR AVENUE FOR PROPOSED WALGREENS
DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JANUARY 26, 2012
FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: MEL LEE, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MEL LEE (714) 754-5611
mel.lee@costamesaca.gov
Accept or reject the following proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA) for processing:
o A site specific floor area ratio (FAR) -.30 maximum FAR allowed; .49 FAR
proposed — for a proposed Walgreens retail store and pharmacy project
on the former Tower Records site.
The propel is located at the intersection of Superior Avenue and Newport Boulevard,
north of 17 Street. The property contains an existing retail building (formerly Tower
Records) which will be demolished to accommodate the proposed project. The property
is zoned C2 (General Business District), has a General Plan Designation of General
Commercial, and is also located within the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area.
Location: 1726 Superior Avenue Application: GPS -11-04
Request: General Plan Screening request GPS -11-04 for site specific floor area ratio (FAR) - .30
maximum FAR allowed; .49 FAR proposed — for a new Walgreens retail store and pharmacy on
the former Tower Records site.
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
SURROUNDING PROPERTY:
Zone:
C2
North:
(Across Superior) C2, Commercial Uses
General Plan:
General Commercial
South:
C2, Commercial Uses
Lot Dimensions:
Irregular
East:
(Across Newport) C2, Commercial Uses
Lot Area:
29,182 SF
West:
C2, Commercial Uses
Existing Development:
Commercial building
(to be demolished) and surface parking
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD COMPARISON
Development Standard
Required/Allowed
Proposed/Provided
Lot Size:
Lot Width (Average)
120 FT
99 FT 1
Lot Area
12,000 SF
29,182 SF
Floor Area Ratio (FAR):
Maximum FAR
.30 8,755 SF
.49 14,310 SF 2
Building Height:
2 Stories/30 FT 1 Story
(w/Basement/32 FT 3
Interior Landscaping:
1,100 SF
0 SF 3
Setbacks (Building):
Front (Superior Ave.
20 FT
67 FT
Side (left/right
0 FT/10 FT
0 FT/ 128 FT
Rear (Newport Blvd.
20 FT
0-1 FT 3
Setbacks (Landscaping)
Newport Blvd.
20 FT
0-18 FT 3
Superior Ave.
20 FT
0-16 FT 3
Parkin
Standard
54
42
Handicapped
3
2
Total
57 Spaces 4
44 Spaces
Bicycle Racks
NA
1 for 5 Bic cies
(1) The property is legal nonconforming.
(2) Site-specific General Plan amendment required for 0.49 FAR deviation.
(3) Does not comply with code requirement — variance application required.
(4) Parking deviation requested based on unique operational characteristics as validated by parking study
by KOA.
H
The applicant is proposing to construct a new 14,310 square foot retail building (9,990
square foot ground -level retail store with 4,320 square foot below grade basement) for
Walgreens. If the General Plan Screening is accepted for processing, the proposal
would require approval of the following:
® Site-specific General Plan Amendment (GPA) to allow a .49 Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
for the project (.30 maximum FAR allowed).
® Variance and/or minor conditional use permit to allow a reduction in required on-site
parking spaces for the project.
® Variance from maximum building height (30 feet allowed; 32 feet proposed).
® Variance from building and landscaped setbacks (20 feet required along Newport
Boulevard and Superior Avenue; 0-1 foot building setback along Newport Boulevard
and 0-18 foot landscaped setbacks along both streets proposed).
® Variance from interior parking area landscaping requirements (1,100 sq. ft. required;
0 sq. ft. proposed).
General Plan Screening Criteria
City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan Land Use Element Objective LU -1E.1 (c)
allows the City Council to accept General Plan Amendments (GPAs) to approve
deviations from the maximum FAR established by the General Plan based on criteria
established by City Council policy (Policy No. 500-2).
The above policy, a copy of which is attached to this memo, establishes three criteria
for accepting GPA requests:
® A GPA is necessary to resolve an inconsistency between General Plan and
zoning designation for a parcel;
® A GPA is necessary to provide a uniform land use designation for a single parcel
or development site; or
® A GPA would result in decreased traffic impacts from the property.
The policy also acknowledges these criteria are only guidelines and City Council may
accept an application which does not meet the criteria if it finds there are overriding
reasons to do so.
f
® Proiect will result in an increase in traffic to the property. Transportation staff
completed a preliminary trip generation analysis and concluded that the proposed
project is expected to result in an increase in trips per the table below.
P
�eOra6
�ai A�
Y�
i0a
Eji �rl�
Tower Records - Specialty Retail
10,620
44.32
-
55
470
General Plan Allowance - General
Commercial
8,755
67.91
14
55
600
Walgreens - Per Traffic Stud (1)
14,310
N/A
41
108
1,160
(1) Source: Traffic Impact Study prepared by KOA Corporation (Attachment 3)
Although the project will result in an increase in traffic to the property, as noted
earlier, City Council Policy allows acceptance of the request if it finds there are
overriding reasons to do so.
Proiect complies with General Plan Communitv Desian Element Obiective CD -
8A. 1.: new and remodeled commercial structures and properties in Costa Mesa
should be designed to reflect the Citv's architectural diversitv. vet be compatible
with nearby existing buildings' scale and character. The proposed development
is a single story building that will be compatible in scale and character to
surrounding buildings in the vicinity. The proposed development will replace an
obsolete building on the property that has been a frequent target of vandalism
and graffiti.
Proiect complies with General Plan Land Use Element Obiective LU -1 C.1: permit
the construction of buildings over two stories or 30 feet only when it can be
shown that the construction of such structures will not adversely impact
surroundina developments and deprive existina land uses of adeauate liaht. air.
Privacy, and solar access. There will be no adverse impacts to surrounding
developments or a deprivation of adequate light, air, privacy, and solar access to
surrounding properties because the 2 foot excess roof height applies to the roof
peak of a single architectural tower element on the northerly portion of the
building.
Proiect will revitalize a aronerty located in the Downtown Redevelopment Proiect
Area. The "Tower Records" site has been vacant for approximately 5 years with
minimal property maintenance. The new Walgreens store would revitalize the
property in keeping with redevelopment objectives. Furthermore, the project will be
consistent with the redevelopment plan as it pertains to the architectural design
guidelines for new construction (i.e., roof materials, building colors and
architecture, etc.).
If City Council directs staff to proceed with the processing of the General Plan
Amendment as discussed above, initial feedback is requested on the following Code
deviations:
0
Parking Determination. The applicant is seeking a determination as to whether the
number of proposed on-site parking spaces will be adequate for the project based on
the parking study prepared by KOA Corporation (Attachment 3) which indicates that,
based on a survey of three similar Walgreens stores, two in Santa Ana and one in
Huntington Beach, the proposed parking supply would adequately serve the new
Walgreens store. The study indicated that the City's retail parking rate of 4 spaces
per 1,000 square feet is not an appropriate rate for this type and size of a Walgreens
store.
® Building and landscaped setbacks (20 feet required along Newport Boulevard and
Superior Avenue; 0-1 foot building setback along Newport Boulevard and 0-18 foot
landscaped setbacks along both streets proposed). Council may wish to provide
general feedback regarding the proposed building setbacks and landscaping.
® Interior parking area landscaping requirements (1,100 sq. ft. required; 0 sq. ft.
proposed). Council may wish to provide general feedback regarding the parking lot
landscaping, and whether or not additional landscaping is desired.
City Council has the following alternatives available for consideration:
1. Accept General Plan Amendment application for processing and provide any initial
feedback related to the proposed Code deviations. This will allow the applicant to
proceed with the application process per City Council policy and based on any initial
feedback related to the proposed Code deviations.
2. Deny application from further processing. Denial of this request would mean that the
project could not proceed to be considered by the Planning Commission or City
Council in its current form.
Fiscal review is not required for this item.
Legal review is not required for this item.
KefliMMIRMWO
Council may accept or reject this project for General Plan Amendment processing. If
the project is accepted for processing, it does not provide an assurance that the
project will be ultimately approved.
ft
MEL LEE, AICP KHANH NGUYE
Senior Planner Interim Develo Services Director
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map
2. City Council Policy 500-2
3. Packet Containing Plans, Parking Study, and Traffic Study
(Separately Bound Document)
DISTRIBUTION: Chief Executive Officer
Assistant Chief Executive Officer
Economic Development Director
City Attorney
Interim Development Svs. Director
Public Services Director
Transportation Svs. Mgr.
City Clerk (2)
Staff (4)
Planning Staff (8)
File (2)
Corrie Kates
P.O. Box 4403
Costa Mesa, CA 92628
Walgreen Co.
106 Wilmot Road, MS #1640
Deerfield, IL 60015
File: CCO20712Wa1 reensScreenin Date: 01/25/12 1 Time: 11:00 am
r
Z
W
2
(r
V
F—
F—
w
Q
U
N
M
X
00
ai
0
N
Cil
(0
Q
(fl
N
r
T
N
N
r
a
N
co
2
U
1
m
(D w
� Q
U 0
O p
U U
Q r Q a
o o'N Q�24�
13
C
g N 9
l
ATTACHMENT
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA
COUNCI L POLICY
POLICY EFFECTIVE
(SUBJECT - NUMBER DATE PAGE
PROCESSING OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 500-2 11/3/86 1 -of 2'
Rev. 8/1/94
Background
The General Plan constitutes the official policy of the City
Council of the City of Costa Mesa with regard to physical
development of the City. The City Council may, at -its option,
amend the General Plan or any element thereof. On August 2,
1982, the City Council enacted Resolution 82-65 adopting
"General Plan Administration and Implementation Policies and
Procedures". These procedures provided that regularly scheduled
General Plan review hearings would be held at the first Planning
Commission meeting in February, June, and October. Since that
date, State Law has been amended to allow elements of the
General Plan to be amended four, rather than three, times during
any calendar year. Due to the increased workload on Staff,
Planning Commission and City Council resulting from the review
of General Plan Amendment applications, the City Council wishes
to review the type and number of such applications prior to
acceptance for processing.
Purpose
It is the purpose of this policy to:
1. Establish dates for the hearing of General Plan
Amendments.
2. Establish guidelines to assist the City Council in
providing direction to Staff with regard to processing
privately initiated General Plan Amendment
applications.
Policy
Privately initiated General Plan Amendment applications shall be
heard at the first Planning Commission meetings in February,
June, and October. A fourth date for, -the hearing of General
Plan Amendment applications may be assigned by the City Council
at its discretion for either privately initiated or City
initiated General Plan Amendments.
The City Council shall review applications for amendments to the
General Plan and shall direct Staff to either proceed with
processing of the applications or to return all materials to the
applicant .and refund the application fee. A list of
applications, including the name of applicant, location of