Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - Annual Performance Audit Work Plan - 7/17/2012MEETING DATE: JULY 17, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: SUBJECT: COUNCIL DIRECTION FOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT WORK PLAN DATE: JULY 6, 2012 FROM: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE PRESENTATION BY: RICK FRANCIS, ASSISTANT CEO FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DAN BAKER (714) 754-5156 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council provide direction regarding the development of a Fiscal Year 2012-13 work plan which will designate specific City services or functions deemed appropriate by City Council for performance auditing services. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On April 17, 2012, the City Council authorized staff to move forward with a detailed implementation plan regarding performance auditing services. Since that time, staff has begun implementing steps to begin this process. Staff has prepared and will soon release a Request for Qualifications that will attempt to designate appropriate local firms qualified in performance auditing services. Once selected, the auditing firm(s) will work with the CEO to create a scope of work specific to the systems and or functions the Council agrees to designate in its annual work plan. Examples of areas that may benefit from a performance audit might include an analysis regarding the efficiency and capacity of certain divisions or work units; an examination of policies, practices and procedures in sensitive areas dealing with cash, property and evidence; or, the levels of customer service in key departments with substantial public interface. The above mentioned examples are for reference only. Staff is seeking direction regarding specific City systems and or functions that Council wishes to have evaluated to ensure efficiency and innovation. Members of the Council were supplied with a worksheet to assist in evaluations as well as the option to send concerns directly to staff regarding specific areas for examination. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no anticipated fiscal impact with the creation of the Annual Performance audit work plan. LEGAL REVIEW: No legal review is necessary. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the City Council provide direction regarding the development of a Fiscal Year 2012-13 work plan which will designate specific areas relative to City systems and or functions deemed necessary by City Council for performance auditing services. RICK FRAN IS DANIEL K. BAKER Assistant CEO Management Analyst ATTACHMENT: 1. Weighted Risk Assessment 2 C3a 3.,a w v_ c s m O O It Q M. O o o 8 @ 0 R7 v< 3 �, o 0 0 n _ q 0 ° 77 a= .< O O N n r n o N 0) N 3 n �, N x N o 3 N O N N NN O O m N N O 0 O Z T N N O N fU N c N 0 N N 01 0/ N O. N ry 0 =ca N O j N N 3 0 g (D O C N 0) (D O c co C 0Sj O (D (D (OD a N So C = (D p N N > �.• 00 < N p. N 0) -'. ' 3 •'. 0 "' (p 3 '�. a O� N m• 7Nc' fit N 0 (D .TN 7C 0 x N a JNC N F CD _ 3 a- (D N S O ti' Oo E CD N O N O0 O .Z a O0 O N 7' n < (D 0 0 c a Cr p `7 -n N N N 4D (D N O O. Q j ((p�� (D N O 0 O 0 O Op �' ( (D O O O a -n ,N. 0� Q N (D O N Q ._• O N O .� SA 0c C 6 a 01 �<'<' cr 3 m=3ui N CL N Q N <7 C ((D 0. Co ry cn c. a (D (D CL O (p -� OO N O, 6 p N N N D (D N O c (=D w (<D N p 0(a (D d O 0 0) 3 O 0 c N C O D) p N 3 (o Q(D (/�N� Er '0 0 ,Np c c Q O o: N 0) CL 0) N< < 3 7 (D j (D p_ 00 0( N N Q 0 0/ 3 (D N O_ N j 7 (p .c+ O N N N@ N 0 j O N Q O N N N N c 3 s 3O3m „O* -� N a O N a O — 3 (D 01 O o' pc O ',,'-�y� O p cz N ^" p' Q N a N O 0 0 .N., N O 01 .. �, N p <= CLa)' Q o N I @ 3 ° o o N 0 CA o NOQ (D((DDm cc vN( i^c 3.m 33 coN � j�p� �p n I?=COi± 00 O a O OCD N N (D 0) '< O y, O N m > my Op Dc N m 0) 0 30° a 3 o d Q d 3cc Qn� w v, (D Q3 3 C j3 c°'iryoN 7 ON N 7�� N p JO mm VNN O. (%19 30 p (D N O Q N = c N O N C) w 0 w w w o o w o CD (c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N O Q 0 �N . x 3 N N N W N N N x3 0 d c Dy WC CL X N F