HomeMy WebLinkAbout- PH-3 - Attachment 6 - 3/4/2018February 4, 2014
Ms. Minoo Ashabi, AIA
Principal Planner
City of Costa Mesa, CA 92628
Received
Developcity of Costa Mesa
m®nt Services Department
FEB 0 5 2014
ATTACHMENT 6
RE: Notice of Public Hearing for 36 unit live / work project at 2023, 2025 and 2027
Placentia Ave., Costa Mesa, CA (the "Project")
Dear Ms. Ashabi,
Thank you for taking the time last week to discuss with me the proposed development of the
Project. As discussed, I am one of the owners of 2013 S. Placentia Ave., Costa Mesa which is
directly adjacent to the Project. On behalf of the owners, I wanted to reiterate that overall we
think that the project will be an improvement to the surrounding neighborhood and community.
However, we have a number of serious reservations and concerns with respect to the Project as
it affects our property and the neighborhood generally. These concerns are as follows:
1. Access and Safety:
The Project and our property share a common drive way for ingress and egress pursuant to a
reciprocal easement agreement. The original grant of easement was in 1959. The intent of this
easement was simply to allow each property owner access to their respective parcels. The uses
have co -existed harmoniously for many years. The current proposal, however, significantly
increases the use of the easement in such a way as to create unsafe conditions for the users of
both properties and, in particular, would burden our property in a way that was never intended.
Having been drafted close to 55 years ago, the shared driveway easement did not contemplate
the issues arising from a pre-existing relatively low density industrial project then sharing
access with a high density residential use due to rezoning. Upon closer examination of the
easement, you will see that, as a practical matter, the current configuration of the Project
creates an untenable situation for both property owners. The easement is currently 24 feet (12
feet on each property). Trucks and cars will be using a very small driveway and the potential for
accidents is inevitable. Under the current configuration of the Project, cars will back out of their
respective parking stalls on our property and block cars exiting the apartment complex,
specifically from Buildings 5 and 6, and vice versa. Please see the attached site plan.
Furthermore, with the garages of Buildings 5 and 6 in the proposed apartment complex opening
up into the driveway easement area without any setback, traffic will be blocked for vehicles
accessing both parcels. These issues will be heightened in the morning when employees come
to the industrial complex and the residents are leaving to go to work at the same time.
Deliveries to the industrial complex further compound this problem, particularly in the early
morning rush hours. We are concerned about the safety of the residents of the Project and the
users of our property as the space is literally too tight to properly accommodate the traffic flow,
—0—
particularly with trucks. It is entirely foreseeable that emergency access to either property
might be blocked due to this situation.
Please remember that the average length of a car is approximately 13.50 feet. You can easily
imagine two cars trying to back up into a 12 foot easement at the same time or a car and a
truck trying to move through the same space. We can also easily imagine owners parking in the
easement even if prohibited. We would like to see the garages turned so that they do not open
up into the common easement area so as to avoid these problems. At the minimum, the
proposed setback for Building 9, in the apartment complex is more appropriate for Buildings 5
and 6 as well given the inherent limitations on egress and ingress based on a shared driveway.
An earlier plan for the Project located the garages on the other side of the Project and this
would entirely eliminate this issue as well.
2. Landscaping: In terms of the new site plan, there is essentially no landscaping proposed
to visually soften or buffer Buildings 5 and 6 and the garage doors that will face the front of our
building. The common area driveway should provide for setbacks which would then provide
room for landscaping. This would seem equally important for the residents of the Project as for
our users.
3. Disclosure: All future buyers and tenants of the Project should be made aware of and
sign off in writing that they are purchasing/leasing residential units adjacent to an active
industrial complex. Some inherent conflicts will surely arise due to the proximity of two
fundamentally different uses — industrial and residential -- so close to one another. I am sure
the City of Costa Mesa will be involved, along with us as the adjacent property owner, in solving
these potential issues long after the developer has sold out. A disclosure required as a
condition of the approval will reduce the potential for such future conflicts.
4. Construction Traffic: Lastly, we want to make sure that construction traffic and vehicles
do not block, stand, stage or use the easement ingress/egress as they will create safety issues
in blocking both emergency vehicles and other cars and trucks trying to access our property.
This should be specifically referenced as a condition to any permits or other approvals granted
for the Project with sufficient teeth to ensure compliance.
I have enclosed for your review an aerial and a description of the easement as well as parcel
map(s).
We appreciate your consideration concerning these issues and we look forward to working
closely with the City of Costa Mesa to resolve the issues related to the proposed residential
development next door and adjacent to us.
Sincerely,
Greg Ashwill
fi
,. . � �' � ism"�`Mn`��h�.'z��r���..�v�.�.,�a�;.;a�str . ; _ _ _ ".
WKEPTUAL SITE PIAN
Im „es; G a..�
SITESUMMARY
Site Area:
1.88 Ac.
Units:
(32) Towhouse Units
1531 sq ft (2bdr+flex2.5ba)
(6) Loft Units
1415-1560sf(2bdr/2ba)
(38) Total
Density:
20.2 du/ac
Open Spats Required:
200sf/Unit
36x200SF = 7600sf/unit
Open Space Provided:
8795sf (Primary onurlyard only)
231sf[unf
..PARKING SUMMARY
Required: 3A per unit
(1 Covered Spaces per unit)
38x3 = 114 Total Spaces
Provided:
Garage Parking: 73 Spaces
Open Guest 41 Spaces
,C
Al.O
KTGY Gr p, Inc.•.,.
Architectu,r Planning
Chy Yenlu.
17922 Rtch
19p9 Guan SW�e
City Ventures
'- h ce 92669
949b512133
es
WKEPTUAL SITE PIAN
Im „es; G a..�
SITESUMMARY
Site Area:
1.88 Ac.
Units:
(32) Towhouse Units
1531 sq ft (2bdr+flex2.5ba)
(6) Loft Units
1415-1560sf(2bdr/2ba)
(38) Total
Density:
20.2 du/ac
Open Spats Required:
200sf/Unit
36x200SF = 7600sf/unit
Open Space Provided:
8795sf (Primary onurlyard only)
231sf[unf
..PARKING SUMMARY
Required: 3A per unit
(1 Covered Spaces per unit)
38x3 = 114 Total Spaces
Provided:
Garage Parking: 73 Spaces
Open Guest 41 Spaces
,C
Al.O
KTGY Gr p, Inc.•.,.
Architectu,r Planning
_•••••��••
17922 Rtch
f9
Wine, CA 92614
a
949b512133
ktgy.oxn
AN m.d
'� r tse�f 0H7EAT1N0 6AafJdZFy
14WW
:. THIS ABREEM6MT entered into thsa slat day of -8t=. .
-1wby and between S. S. COOI and 816119 B. =a, husband Rffi
9 Wife, AN parYiee of the first part and BTA]p= N. 8CM19 mod
DOLfit sc"tr-ft. husband am vitt. parties of the *►aged portr
— r1TMrsscTrai
That the first parties are the Wnara of that gcpteiu real
property Iodated in the City of Costa Meda, Covaty of DrOW.
State of Caltfaraia, known an 2025 Plaoentia Arenas in said City
and described mai
The Horth } of Lot 33 and the, Booth } of
Lot 12 all in Block A, Tract 612, as per
map recorded in Book 20, pages 1 d 2, Mis-
eellaneode Mara, Record; of Cramp County,
Cal f tornia.
That the second parties are the owners of the/Clty*rA
erty located in the City of Costs Nees, County of tt
or California, known As 2D1) placentla Avenue in s
described As;
The South } or Lot 1) eYid the North } o
f Lot 14 .2I in glodk R; Tract 612, ee pars:ap recorSed Sn Book 20, Pages 1 k 2, Mcellaneous Maps, Reeorde of Orange CounCalifornia.
That the parties 1wreto are decircua of erebtright-or-waf for lPgroaa and egrsee and for utilit
benafit o' aeon of thea,
NOW. THERETOHEE.y t/k: parties agree with each other as fol -
owls
That an eeaewant e for Sngreae and agreed and for uties t
19 favor of t1re south } or -Loi. 13 and the North } of said Lot
la, is created over the Southerly li f � Y of the North } of said
n a
Lot 13, and at, taoemek over the Northerly 12, tact of the South
} of :.at 13 is created in favor cr said Porto or sa14 Lot 13
1. •b /-'
�aM'PaH. aaoa,aM aw 4aaeNEYTi
ARa.iM a4 Ln.l
atl(N le!
W,.W YYwaye ay„er.b
cower aµex, warowu
MrYa 6•T,a
• i. A,
)ascription: Orange, CA Document- Book Page (Pre" 1982) 4878.188 Page: 1 of 9
)rder: d Comment:
—8-4
10.1
' A S_
and the South of said Lot 1¢ for the y A�"'M'"
D rpeaa of creating a
Conten rightayr-day for ingress a,-ld synods for the lnptaYlatiom
Of ut111tiea aUeh as water, ems, vlec,rleity end sewer, 22 feet
1n w!dtb, for the benefit or :Otbparties,
It is agreed between the parties tta, the first part'
w171 lw;rreve the roadway ever the easement so mage ane the sN
Bond portiss shall pay one-half the coat at each time as th"
$tart using the faculties. The sewer 16 to be installed by'
the first elf the portion heroto needing or detlring such faail-
lty end the other party &groom to pay one-half of -hr east
Charter at Ct.h tine on re do-ires to Utilize Ruch faoiLLty ArA
zakee a canneotion on amid property, The a&me procedure Rhall
be f011cwdd r.l rercrance to nny joint water, pees• Or cam
faciiltlea bl;t eatl: 7r the partIAP hereto may, at his own east
i
Rnd expanse, lastall h1e lnd:vidual water, power or gas
Yash -ties.
tach or tle partlen Lareto does hereby `rant, moll one oon-
cey ❑std the ether purty as grantees. titch h01r,; &.4 assigum,
A perpatual dapement over the L1 foot strip hereitubove tee..
oribed nor tl.e purposto herein set forth, which said eaaeeesnt
Rl:all run with said dasorlbed pr.Merty and the title thtreto,
are[ be hinding tion tw resydctivs erantdre and their balrm And '
an any pdrsnn tLat atoll herrinafter acquire such title to salt
desoribed properties.
_;{ :i1:ISK56 •n'iZPEOP the pr.rtiea hereto have hereunto eat i
,:.tlr lAndm t::^eday and year fillet above written,
n RCT PAATIPS
$cliche ---�---
>eMiption: Orange, CA Document - Book Page (Are -1982) 4878. 4 Page. 2 of 3
lyder: d Comment:
N
w
W
=;
--4878 n. -r �8+}
STATE OF CALIPORNIL
MUM op CSANO,t
On ` �� 191, before sa, the: Undo ,.
signed, t Notary Public in Rrd for said Countir and State, Par -
0011411Y apptartd 5, J. Cao)c and Elale 9. Cote, blown to ua to
to the persona where resrea ars RuLuarihod Co the: within inatrw
seat and aoknawledged that they executed the ewoo,
W1TUSS ay hand and official Real.
Miary u 'fit Tn cn pb .
u. h,•. Ceynt9 and 8:a td, {'., -..,., ,;,�
STATE cap CALIFDECiIA )
COUNTY or ORANGE as,
On ^°-+=•�' �. _,,,�.� 19 •,/, before me, the une.ar.,•
signed, a Nctdry Public in and for said County end State, per_
cossets ap;)etccd Sturtlev w, 8e4ulte ami Dolly Schulte, F:nowr. to
Rt to he Olt Perrone whose na:oee are subscribed to the wl th:n
lns,rusent and ac Y.nnwledgtd tiw.t they executed the ease,
p'ITNE35 ny hand and official aeal.
r
0 ar;flUU14C in an ar'a�a
wCcuaty andS:ato.
'
r.r,C.rlUEQ F�:
1 '.._l:, t_a
eCWRCt at
c.. a, Rw+.
$3.Gb
)escriptioni Orange, CA Document - Book Page (Pre -1882) 4878. lea page: 3 of S
)rder d Comment.,
I I
�Ilill��ii ;, I
j �aespweAwwvnnar 4318 BK 13729PO 492
i�. w° Mx aA amr rnnraM M..a
r trail 3kxsrran I MIX
Aw;w 2013 Plm=tia
outf, Masa, Ca
std L
Ib
van rad paeeaW,asa
I w r � M9AlP, Ift � gap
i °�: CtlAMFNU% prxlw
L J
rrp9 MMrr .,.@1tMIM ... �rApeFS6 AaM 4ew 6a4Yaa ala4M4Fa YeP
GRANT
k.HFf ...
EED
THE UNDFRGIGNEO GRANTCnle1 W1 "AEM ®•
OOC WOVARY TRANNSyEN TAX N 19 0maidatwtion Lada t'`An (rico
Q eoR pAod on IUB V" of prop.Ay conwayed, nw
C1 nanWnalhillrafueNgmluaWIknre or anaumbrarwa mnbinlnAa ome of Nk.
1.7 wnreeapurarefW arae 81 "Yet
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIOEROMON, lecelpl ei wnten N Iwnby acknowledged,
Eylvwt:r J. Cook aid Maio a WWc to ts,%, Und a doalaratio,
Of tdetlt dated Much 31, 1977
haf®bp9 fARANT(SI Is Pr4n% L,. NC �avran, M IriMRr led I , Codes 139 rAwan, n
na@rriad awn, Lied W. G",sn, a rmazied mAn, Sam Miss, a curried wan, and
Gary G. Jc 1an end %eqer.ine Jordan, Iwebard and rife, re joint tenets
each ss to an urdividsd orle-fitth interest,
the following described real pnnmrly In Iha city of oxtm Mean
Gcnmiyel Oran3e . 61st* M odEornia+
;y
An enc nait for S+uuc , agrees, " publf.0 Ltllitiae over thn northerly
••/VV�JJ, 1 foot of the Seutterly 12 feet of parcel. 1 aril 2 as per wwp filed
In Bek 149, Pars 1 and 2 of Parcel Maps in the ofFice of tho oaanty
L%oorder of said arawnty.
It is the intention of the grantaro by thio grant of eammut to widen
the sxiating road Over` tte s L&Jvt rly portion of their 1'nd.
oalsd 2 Au
STATE OFa 41YORMAy �[S&
1NYY
to1Oi 9t4flaQ
on �4 Auauet 1480 beipa �.
VaairllpMa, a NNW .baa b aM M, am 844, aanaaYRY
krit*taM:a, _ _
In Ova Mraaa __+koea arrM-A-LM— 'broom
b tM MRnm 4aburrrM as0 aab,Mrp4getl sut___ thati_�
eN M.
oyplGlAi, BCiI
xorWO p' AC G1A LLL Y
pre uwmnu CC
AW
of
ora waM won a rev
(eW frvs4l MlkNlxpp„y
j 'i 1 1 t �0i+e
'r'
e=djotion: Orange, CA Document -Book Page (Pre -1982) 13729.492 Page: 1 of 1 ` I �,•, �
rder. ddss Comment:
s�F"1 0
D
H �,a'�
�p
I I� ANDINA .rw,wmIrr BK 13729p(g 4q 3
r"asmwd 4317
l MIDwr r Fir MIA me 03ok
1310 14UYIW4
OcutA No", CA tlaOpAq¢ ar t
L rmt
III, i uda ta%uA e ro au/�ae wl�se., t.t
.ter a.akoft+►er
a
L -J
mareeoes..._._ ®t+w+e w._ � NAitAroMl yNY nlsada lNeeakNFe Na
GRANT DEW
THE UNDERSIGNED ORANTORI8i DECLAREIBf
I VOCUhtMARY TRANSFER TAXI, R,.s ..�.a<.,.e.. lean than 6100
❑ corrputvd on 10 value of property awmyed, 0,
CJ odmpuladonlWlveWelaarvrlue of lent 9r enaum6mera rarWmrgai tlma of hale.
!'.i wgnoorporatod area j[] oltyof—ra Sia w'nly._—_„AND
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, racalpt of Widah to hereby acknoWisdpsd.
Frank l.. F# Gavran, Charles ml,- ttavrteh, m7SA tt ;nvrml, Sam Kajas,
Gmy U. JOt[tan and Yntherim Jordon.
w
i { , here"RANT(a)
SylvevUr J. Onok mid Slate S, (%x*tnW4ea Uxvr deolaeratim of
tsoet dated a(aimh 31, 1977.
tho Ivaewkl0 dararWad real property In the City of C wta Now
County of Orange , state of CaSformn?
An eaaaavent Cos Angreos, egrxae eMd pWlic utilities Over the ItrN0=ly
1 Cwt Of I be awtlrrly 12 fent of the South 1/2 oft L 1 Ulmk
-31- of Treat 612, Costa Haan' 7araueE ass an,4h
-a kd Tay
I BO:* 20 Pages 1 and 2 of Hidtell&w=w maps.
1t is the inti tim or tt= grantor by dais grant of "kwWt to widen
A tw mtlating mad over the northerly 1porrLat of dmdx lwo.
I.
I.
r
I
)))
WATa OF CALIFdntall }oa.
- UNt L a rrkn off. Nn
i.nanlp” a "Am rAft H aea W am aids, ppwany
_rc
immunwiamoNAM
radrA Is nd a
ha w. M'aYn ..._.__, pato a+ea—ol "maw
aelnamminanuem.trw; x+^�;�la.i�_.___�. �
KU
6vivux-" N My i+mm het aakar eea, ainmuse we ra.u. µ . .• � �
n nAHANIAIM
OUM 904111111
(I NTAM1fMtIr YA NgPeq Mla flAl6 .ww'1iouWx
!,k�l �!i{ i �IIIIiI �lrl j�ii I
rscripUon: Orange, CA document -Book Page (Pre -1982) 13729.493 Page: i o(2
der.' ddss Comment:
0\`
flftj. "lf BK 13729PO 494
%I Aft IN 1 AIMtMNM
IWNlvol OrlNe11_., _Jis vewmlpe
I` Im_._Au�raac.l9..L9Dq_.g..��..i(_�..._.___rfa._.n,. M.••.sYeaw4aNaNr r�uro.lala xN
IaWIIN IwNiw-- _-w�-'v--1R�'4na.nlo.w --- —
b� N...nuly In"euwl„ a.A r. SnAMedryl rtal he...�
.In w.A Mr Hm. pRKIM SFA\
M'11N111 a,Y AW yd Wle d xn NAAIAN NA[NN6
In .Inf•N, YS �'
OSAIIOF tp{aMY
µ (ws,WMs bWAI XI„ It fkl
Nw. ,-. b aw MvunP vdl
IIAarvMYAN
111UNlr OI, _ Ol'ee9a 91
eMM IL<Y
111{ �
u.... Augua t 19, 1990
I:wge Arcs eM awe molPn 1'uFIN m wu lar xd
Swe. PrW i9f.GALr;
nYm.vxlm'mIA*a�M_
lMnr[x.,®_�MAua a,vvplr eH ..ub5.Ir6eS
to tSr wnlan nlaawni Ard nL.x.IAAM Anl Ckey_
l ryotw
..w...1..«-...-..
r• uW 4m rPnw
IMI[Inl SrAI._
NAIM f! ar fwd sAJ WG,.1 ,.e1
xA;IAN XAI"If
oIlAN6[t:oMgq
!
W,
.ne^•,T��AMOwiiY!yl ldf µu'•,ri'..
_.—
l�mwnn
ne�w"w w.wrwxw
lfnlAvmeJl
Stiff of l'ASMMKMA
$
COUNIV of _ OY¢¢ a
�5�.
s
wmrl pe
JJ
t>a Auguet 21,
.3990
tv IM mtlMn mq -t Nd mkw kd',, IWaI _ bsx,
p e
6MfAIM IM ame
Oman HAt 1re74
MIMS& my F.Ad mle ollaN wt
MA
i f-
«,. urwrxrt � 3
6
ascription: Orange, CA Document - Book Page (Pre -1982) 13728.493 Page; 2 oil' i
der: ddss Comment:
0
_.•l.._ —_ _q��'M'"1 `dam uYe.r 1 -, f'1 %if(i�i I:IJ•'kk'`.. if li: J
84-525078
n. aalO aaaYWaaaY . .
NMVVAM r 1® m alm Passat "m
1NR. 1 q
P Mr. a M,, Cook 6
7310 lfarglaad
Coate Maga, Callfotnia
aJ
Same as above
e
L. J
unaaa®rc�„�_��
TM UMMIGM GRANTOW OWWAM
C✓I
an fu T Hpopurty �� j cC jm daeaticn lane ?:ban 0100.00
❑ le*QOUvawaLseavWue Of N#* Or al aqa
❑ uahWWrewd arae ®gym at HalamedR
FOR A VA+LUABU CONMUERA AMD
TSL, Iawgpe dL whM as
Frank L.. Mc®avraa, Charles; Me Cavran, lred Meer
e Ca '
and Katherine Jordan Cavi'anf Basi Kn$ss, eery C. Jordan
yrcvh 91, 197�k Aad Ell" S' Cook traateas ander declamtion of treat dated ,.
-counORP t q+�o1*9 @ad rapt prOparly bt N1a f YD1 ffcout a^,mew
Orang+3n easement for 'We", agraaa and public utllitiea ovei ahs Stothar2y 1 foot
of the Northerly 12 feet of the South d/2 of lone•13•'f ...
Block "A" of Tract 612, Conte Hexa Terrace�ap r -
Pages 1 and 2 of Htae as M".°H a n a Sap recorded in Book 20
it la the inteatloa of the frantor'br this grant of eaarant to 'Idea the
eadetdnS road over the Northerly portion or Chair, Land,
This easement dead is recorded Far the purpose of Correcting that certain eaeement
deed recorded September 4th, 1900, in ',Hook 19729, page 499, of official Roeorde,
Wriptfon: Orange, CA Document-Year®oclD 1984.525078 Page: 1 of
der: ddss Comment."
Iq6 -
IS
"
tem aw wM palm gap
Hr. # Mrs cook
3918 Harylau
L:
conca No", Gallforntw
DINY F9Mt.�OPfDNe O� 1�" 84-525078
an. �&cvJiokr7 ` .,.IAS°4.m.".iwa Upya�m.mw.
�.pdearen
.e,memawaAuk,wpwanl ana to aw dw,
TMW A l fUEBA M
r. mIp111RYvumn. dv�
, gTAym OF CAL W *MM
cww"OF pumps
wF ate' v� aevw�.»a
�t a
8100.00
M
G. Jordan
sMTE OF COWDAM
couftw w o•e&•'E }°`
hawa m.. Vo widanowtI4, ROM a ra
agaeonpy anewnmew
w+dean to be 00 "nwx.
to" uuamawm Mad K*
ae wem.
wirws�
: Spnwun
1' wwa an n.+uav,
plm
Gotmty of
N th6i. A _dsY ®P .In ePM See i. „`.bcfora me, Ae6e-ce 9ke1♦nr,
k Hatm'i FobNm ka 60 hoe Ur ,.GtaewtY. eppaend EEO N4 Ga®[•An
(j pnrtm 0f ktw m to mm eprowto oo� we the6emb of g'Hikdtwy mH�,em
r m Im 00 A+nW whM nwM 1s mbwlbW w tisk kaniu d, end Wkno ?W Hew $.AV V' mmd
44 [EAU
pE nrvirlAl, LL WITH ny,hood wd etlkW ad,
ftwMj�wOPARM u ppGuplluYv6gnW ,^ -•'�'� .•s '� �
bj map MAi q mAt Nwmv �°aawki an rod tw ro. Afl8 � Cnuniy wsd 8a6a.
lescription:Orange,CADocument-Year.DoclD1984.525078Page:2of2�g #!W-�e---5
Irder ddss Comment:
1 I'a
4y1�11rn
• .Il
9
a
1
I
} idD9i
1
1
�low "Womm
�Li'ILRRIYIYFea111' J
9 =�
50
MARCR /get
MIF>s'08°Y W
MK4MA
29
COl6ifl OF OUNU
28
po
AHM
g
r
I
i
1
1
r 1
F I
l
F
1
1
,
r
,
F
a
I
291 i
r
i i
I 1
g
I
z
Ig
8
pi
AM tae!
50
MARCR /get
MIF>s'08°Y W
MK4MA
29
COl6ifl OF OUNU
The
Gas
IN Company
A Sernpra Energy utility"'
February 4, 2014
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Attn: Minoo Ashabi
1919 S. Stale College Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92806-6114
Subject: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration -Planning Application PA -13-21
Urban Master Plan Deviation in the Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan Area;
Costa Mesa
This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project but
only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas
Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas facilities
within the service area of the project could be altered or abandoned as necessary without any
significant impact on the environment.
Information regarding construction particulars and any costs associated with initiating service
may be obtained by contacting the Planning Associate for your area, Arturo Arzaluz, at (714)
634-3040.
Sincerely,
Armando Torrez
Technical Services Supervisor
Orange Coast Region- Anaheim
ATJ,,
_.9- 3
Shane L. Siisby, P.E., Director
1�(�- C 300 N. Flower Street
(L C I�uMlicW�rks
Santa Ana,
.B 92703
4048
P.O. Box 4048
Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048
Integrity, Accountability, Service, Trust Telephone: (714)667-8800
Fax: (714) 967-0896
Received
City of Costa Mesa
Development Services Department
JAM 21N1413-066
January 16, 2014
Ms. Minoo Ashabi, AIA Principal Planner
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626
SUBJECT: Notice of Intent to Adopt an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
36 -unit live/work project at 2023, 2025 and 2027 Placentia Avenue
Dear Ms. Ashabi:
The County of Orange has reviewed the Notice of Intent to Adopt an Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the 36 -unit live/work project at 2023, 2025 and 2027 Placentia Avenue
located in City of Costa Mesa and has no comments at this time. We would like to be advised of
any further developments on the project. Please continue to keep us on the distribution list for
future notifications related to this project.
Sincerely,
Polin Modanlou, Manager`
Strategic Land Planning Division
OC Public Works/OC Planning Services
300 North Flower Street
Santa Ana, California 92702-4048
Polin.modanlou@ocpw.ocgov.com
PM/yj
lq-1-1�
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 12
3347 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100
IRVINE, CA 92612.8894
PHONE (949) 724-2000
FAX (949) 724-2019
TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
January 7, 2014
Minoo Ashabi
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Subject: 36 -Unit Live/Work Project
Dear Ms. Ashabi,
ived
City of Costa Mesa
Development Services Department
JAN 13 '2014
File: IGR/CEQA
SCH#: 2013121079
Log #: 3615
SR -55
Flex your power.!
Be energy efcienti
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Initial Study and Mitigated
Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the 36 -Unit Live/Work Project. The project consists of
the development of 36 units with a floor area ratio of 0.92. The proposal also includes attached
three-story and two-story townhome style development and a three-story attached six -unit
building facing Placentia Avenue with 69 garage parking spaces and 39 open parking spaces.
The nearest state transportation facility to the project site is SR -55.
The California Department of Transportation (Department) is a commenting agency on this
project and has no comment at this time. However, in the event of any activity within the Department's
right-of-way, an encroachment permit will be required.
Please continue to keep us informed of this project and any future developments, which could
potentially impact the State Transportation Facilities. If you have any questions or need to
contact us, please do not hesitate to call Miya Edmonson at (949) 724-2228.
Sincerely,
Maureen El Harake, Branch Chief
Regional -Community -Transit Planning
C: Scott Morgan, Office of Planning and Research
-q5-
"Caltrans improves mobility across California"
Page 1 of 4
ASHABI, MINOO
From:
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 11:51 AM
To: RIGHEIMER, JIM, MONAHAN, GARY; MENSINGER, STEPHEN, GENTS, SANDRA; LEECE, WENDY;
ASHABI, MINOO; ARMSTRONG, GARY; jimfitzeco@gmail.com; rdickson.cmpc@gmail.com;
colinkmccarthy@yahoo.com; aventrue@ca.rr.com; twsesler@gmail.com
Subject: Letter re: 2023/2025/2027 Placentia Ave.
hello all,
please find the included info below re: 2023/2025/2027 Placentia Ave. hard copy to be mailed.
thank you!
cynthia
-----Forwarded Message -----
From: "LEECE. WFNDY" <wendy.leece@costamesaca.gov>
To:
Cc: "ARMSTRONG, GARY"<GARY.ARMSTRONG@costamesaca.gov>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: letter
Thank you for your letter Ms. Breatore.
Gary, what is the status of this project? When will it go before the
planning commission?
Thank you.
City of
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200
wendyleece@costamesaca.gov
costamesaca.gov
Please Click on 60th Anniversary Celebration to find Volunteer Application.
The City of Costa Mesa is celebrating its
60th anniversary in 2013, and to
commemorate this milestone, the City
has created this page dedicated to
events, news, and other information
01/13/2014 1q(0—
Page 2 of 4
60 anniversary logo related to the anniversary and
festivities.
From:
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:39 AM
To: LEECE, WENDY; LEECE, WENDY; wendyleece@gmail.com
Subject: letter
January 10, 2014
Attn.: Costa Mesa City Council Members, Costa Mesa Planning
Commission Members,
Minoo Ashabi, City of Costa Mesa Principal Planner
Gary Armstrong, Economic and Development Services Director
Re: Proposed project at 2023/2025/2027 Placentia Ave., Costa Mesa, CA
92627
These comments must be included in any further development plans for the
subject project referenced above. The questions and comments below are what
I can provide at this current time. I'm sure I will have more questions in the
future if this project is actually approved in its current form.
• According to plans these 3 story townhomes have roof decks that will
look down on immediately adjacent low density private properties i.e.
backyards private windows
• City plan says light industrial? Mixed Use? Urban Overlay?
• Plan is deceptive, as the address stated on plan is 2023/2025/2027
Placentia which is not the case according to plan on city's website
• Project is actually abutting residences at 2014, 2020 and 2022
Federal Avenue in R1 zone as far as I can tell. It's very confusing.
• The plan is not clear or at very best vague re: front, side and back
setbacks on map
• 13 '- 20' setbacks for a 3 story complex, with a roof deck next to
neighbor's yard are completely inappropriate to insure privacy at
abutting R1 address'
• The original plan for this property type is part of the West Bluffs
Urban Overlay included in redevelopment plan that was disbanded by
Governor of California
• When the new successor dept. was formed after disbanding - were
the overlay parameters changed or just a copy of code info from old
redevelopment plan?
—qq,
01/13/2014
Page 3 of 4
• Why was Redevelopment plan disbanded? Was it because of issues
and possible problems in that program?
• Does this project, and all of West Bluff projects that will abut R1
properties, take into account the current property owners/property tax
payers' rights in the adjacent low density residential neighborhood
• Does this project favor new higher density development over current
private property owners in low density rl homes
• How can a "live/work" project of this size be appropriate in this area
when the city and developer cannot even ensure this will actually be
live/work
• Why would city want to add development on this site that may or
may not be owner occupied when completed
• How can the city prevent this townhome complex from becoming an
"apartment type complex" bordering R1 single family homes with all of
the loss of privacy, noise and traffic to go with it?
• Does this take away the R1 property owners rights to have input over
the multifamily home projects that will allow these issues i.e. property
privacy, noise and traffic
• Would developing this current plan set a precedent for future
projects in Westside Costa Mesa?
I am opposed to the 3 story projects that have a minimum 13'- 20' setbacks
from R1 properties
If this project is built, it will cause property values to drop on Federal Ave. and
much of the Freedom Home neighborhood
I find that the "NEW" proposed project at 2023/2025/2027 Placentia is not
compatible and harmonious with the surrounding single family residence
properties and is much too large in scale, would decrease property values due
to loss of privacy, would create considerable noise 24 hours a day, and traffic
issues. It will create a burden on RI "low density homes" and their owners
The proposed project does not substantially comply with Costa Mesa Municipal
Code because:
The proposed addition plan is not compatible and harmonious with the
surrounding properties and is too large in scale.
The project is not in accordance with current municipal code for
development in R1 neighborhood, and abutting R1 low density homes
CL Commercial Limited District
This district is intended for unique areas of land which, due to the
proximity of residential development or the potential for traffic circulation
hazards, requires special precautions to be taken to assure appropriate
development. The district is also intended for industrial areas where
commercial uses must be considered according to their compatibility with
existing or permitted industrial uses.
In response to City of Costa Mesa's proposal to adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the Project:
"The Mitigated Negative Declaration is based on the finding that, through
compliance with the Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures, the
Project's potential significant adverse impacts would be reduced to a less than
wo
01/13/2014
Page 4 of 4
significant level."
I completely disagree and feel that this project's potential significant adverse
impacts would not be reduced to a less than significant level and is completely
inappropriate for this property.
Thank you for your time,
Cynthia C. Breatore
Canyon Park / Freedom Home neighborhood
01/13/2014
SOUMERN, CALIFORNIA
EDISON
INTIR% 1011%
January 24, 2014
Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Jenelle Godges, Region Manager
Local Public Affairs
7333 Bolsa Avenue
West inster, CA 92683
eceilf
gy �9lC �Ity Costo servIc M
saGs C
JAAO , ZOF POrtme.P
Re: 36 -Unit Live/Work Project at 2023, 2025, and 2027 Placentia Avenue
Southern California Edison (SCE) appreciates the opportunity to provide review and comment on the
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 36 -unit live/work project at 2023, 2025, and 2027
Placentia Avenue. The proposed project would include an urban master plan for the development of 36 -
unit live/work units (30 lofts and live/work units and six residential units) on a 1.88 -acre property.
SCE is the electrical service provider for the City of Costa Mesa. SCE maintains an electrical system that
consists of a network of electrical facilities (transmission, distribution, and supporting appurtenances)
within the City. SCE has not evaluated the electric service requirements for the proposed project. Based
on the scope of the project, it may require upgrades to SCE's electric system and infrastructure. To
initiate the service evaluation, SCE requests that the project developer contact our Local Planning
Department at (714) 895-0244.
SCE is concerned about potential impacts to our easements or proposed structures in close proximity to
our facilities. If the project proposes to impact SCE facilities or its land related rights, please forward five
(5) sets of project plans, and a PDF copy of the same, depicting SCE's facilities and its associated land
rights to SCE's Real Properties Department at the address below. Any proposed use will be reviewed on
a case-by-case basis by SCE for compatibility with SCE right-of-way constraints and rights. Approvals or
denials will be in writing based upon review of the maps provided by the developer.
Real Properties Department
Southern California Edison Company
2131 Walnut Grove Avenue
G.0.3 — Second Floor
Rosemead, CA 91770
Please be advised if development plans result in the need to build new or relocate existing SCE electrical
facilities that operate at or above 50 kV, they may result in significant environmental impacts subject to
CEQA review as required by the California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) General Order 131-D. If
those significant environmental impacts are not identified and addressed in this environmental document,
SCE may be required to pursue a later, separate, mandatory CEQA review through the CPUC, which may
delay approval of the SCE power line portion of the project for two years or longer.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
Janelle.Godges@sce com or (714) 895-0271.
Sincerely,
Jenelle Godges
Local Public Affairs Region Manager
Southern California Edison Company
1®0 �
South Coast
Air Quality Management District
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178
(909) 396-2000 • www.agmd.gov
E -Mailed: January 23, 2014 January 23, 2014
minoo.ashabi@costamesaca.gov
Ms. Minoo Ashabi
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Review of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft MND) for the
36 -Unit Live/Work project at 2023, 2025 and 2027 Placentia Avenue
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff appreciates the
opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following comment is
intended to provide guidance to the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the
final California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document as appropriate.
Surrounding Light Industrial Land Uses
The SCAQMD staff recognizes the potential long term regional air quality benefits from
the proposed mixed use project that may reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the
region. However, the SCAQMD staff is concerned about the project's placement of
sensitive land uses' (i.e., residential units) in an existing light industrial area.
Specifically, the project site is surrounded by light industrial uses that appear to include
auto body repair, waste handling and other uses. Such uses are sometimes associated
with odor and other air quality concerns among both residents and businesses. Therefore,
the SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency provide additional
information/discussion in the final CEQA document that identifies potential emissions
sources from light industrial facilities surrounding the project site. In the event that the
Lead Agency determines that the light industrial operations surrounding the project site
could trigger potential air quality and odorous impacts to future residents the Lead
Agency should include mitigation measures necessary to minimize such impacts.
SCAQMD Contact Information
The SCAQMD staff requests that the Lead Agency provide the SCAQMD with written
responses to all comments contained herein prior to the adoption of the CEQA document.
Further, staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address these issues and any
'California Air Resources Board. Apri12005. "Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community
Health Perspective." Accessed at: htti)://www.arb.ca.g_ov/ch/landuse.htm
-1®1-
Ms. Minoo Ashabi 2 January 23, 2014
other questions that may arise. Please contact Dan Garcia, Air Quality Specialist CEQA
Section, at (909) 396-3304, if you have any questions regarding the enclosed comments.
IM:DG
ORC 131227-02
Control Number
Sincerely,
Ian MacMillan
Program Supervisor, CEQA Inter -Governmental Review
Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources
The
Gas
in Company
A Sempra Energy Utu ty"
February 4, 2014
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Attn: Minoo Ashabi
1919 S. State College Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92806-6114
Subject: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration -Planning Application PA -13-21
Urban Master Plan Deviation in the Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan Area;
Costa Mesa
This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project but
only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas
Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas facilities
within the service arca of the project could be altered or abandoned as necessary without any
significant impact on the environment.
Information regarding construction particulars and any costs associated with initiating service
may be obtained by contacting the Planning Associate for your area, Arturo Arzaluz, at (714)
634-3040.
Sincerely,
Armando Torrez
Technical Services Supervisor
Orange Coast Region- Anaheim
AT/Ps
rz tn,&dnc
ASHABI, MINOO
From:
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:53 PM
To: ASHABI, MINOO; RIGHEIMER, JIM; MONAHAN, GARY; MENSINGER, STEPHEN; GENIS,
SANDRA; LEECE, WENDY; ARMSTRONG, GARY; 'jimfitzeco@gmail.com";
'rdickson.cmpc@gmail.com'; "colinkmccarthy@yahoo.com'; "aventrue@ca.rr.com';
"twsesler@gmail.com"
Cc: GUARRACINO, JERRY
Subject: Information for Public Hearing for 2025/2027 Placentia
To: Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner, Costa Mesa Planning Commission, Costa Mesa City
Council Members,
Gary Armstrong, Director of Development and Planning
Re: Proposed Plan and TTM at 2023/2025/2027 Placentia Ave. dated January 31,
2014. For the Public Hearing Meeting on February 10, 2014
Hello Again,
Please find my comments and questions in response to development plans for 2023, 2025,
2027 Placentia Avenue & include them in any planning/zoning & development documents
for this project. Add my comments and questions in any documentation for consideration
and review at Public Hearing Meeting of February 10, 2014.
These are my concerns:
The Council Screening of this proposed project was included in the February 4, 2014
meeting, prior to the Public Hearing Meeting scheduled for February 10, 2014. Also it was
not agendized for the 02/04/ 14 screening meeting
and was only referred to in oral statements.
Although I am pleased to note that the developer removed the 6 3 -story residential units
from R1 property line and
replaced them with 2 story units, I am still concerned that the 1 st floors will have only a 10 foot setback.
Because of the way these lots are situated, the 3rd stories of the many of the units will still
have views into the backyards and private windows of the R1 properties on Federal Ave. I
don't see how this can be mitigated with a project of this size. Perhaps a computer model
with line of site could be generated to give residents an idea of how this project would affect
our R1 properties and neighborhood if built in this form.
I feel there should be a "light and shadow" study done for this project for the residents on
Federal Ave.
What types of trees may be used to mitigate the boxy appearance and to beautify the
project as seen from Federal Ave?
In reading the First Carbon Solutions' document provided, I took note and have of the
comments below:
So Cal Edison Real Properties Department
I am interested to see how Edison's' easements, right of way constraints and rights will be
handled and if they have any effect on the homes on Federal Ave.
South Coast Air Quality Management District
What does "The project placement of sensitive land uses, i.e. residential units" mean?
I am concerned of how final traffic improvements would be designed to accommodate
ingress and egress to these homes and business'. Placentia Ave is a notoriously busy &
dangerous route. Unfortunately there have been fatalities here. Along with the Lighted
Crosswalk I believe there would need to be stop lights and or stop signs installed.
In looking over the geotechnical documentation from SoilWorks, I am curious of what the
term "constraints" in regards to ground water means. I may have more questions on this
report as I look over that document further.
The parking for homes and small business are very restricted according to plan details. I don't understand how
they can be appropriate for all of these live/work residential units.
I still don't understand how the live/work aspect can or will be monitored is it prior to building? At the TTM
level? It's very confusing.
I feel that live/work townhomes and lofts are a good idea, but there is more work to be
done.
I look forward to more changes for the plan and consideration of issues I've listed. It could
be a good fit for our neighborhood if all precautions are taken to preserve harmony,
privacy, and the rights of residents to quiet enjoyment of our homes.
Thank You to Minoo, staff and the proponents of this plan for development for all of your
hard work!
Cynthia C. Breatore
—�ols—
ASHABI, MINOO
From:
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:37 PM
To: ASHABI, MINOO; RIGHEIMER, JIM; MENSINGER, STEPHEN; GENIS, SANDRA; LEECE,
WENDY; ARMSTRONG, GARY; jimfitzeco@gmail.com; rdickson.cmpc@gmail.com;
colinkmccarthy@yahoo.com; aventrue@ca.rr.com; twsesler@gmail.com; GUARRACINO,
JERRY
Subject: Proposed High Density Project on Placentia
Arm.: Costa Mesa City Council Members, Costa Mesa Planning Commission Members,
Minoo Ashabi, City of Costa Mesa Principal Planner
Gary Armstrong, Economic and Development Services Director
I am concerned about a proposed high density project on Placentia. The plans are not clear, but appear to be 2
and 3 story structures that overlook private homes on Federal Avenue. While this project doesn't directly effect
my home, projects of this sort do effect the whole neighborhood. We are long time Canyon Park/Freedom
Home residents and hope to keep the integrity of our close knit neighborhood. A project of this sort is not
compatible with single family residences and has the probability of increased noise and traffic as well as
decreased property values. Please reconsider approval for this project.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Diane Rybacek
-- 10Isa