Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 - CC-4 - Attachment 2 - 6/17/2014ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF COSTA MESA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN 0 SECTION ONE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES El Introduction Traffic signal coordination is one of the vital aspects of a traffic circulation system because it ensures that motorists are able to travel through multiple intersections along a corridor with minimal stops and short delays. A well-timed, coordinated system permits continuous movement along an arterial or throughout a network of major streets with minimum stops and delays, which, reduces fuel consumption and improves air quality Goals, Objectives and Policies The primary goals, objectives and policies included in the circulation element of the adopted General Plan for the City of Costa Mesa are as follows; Goal CIR-1: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide for a balanced, uncongested, safe, and energy-efficient transportation system, incorporating all feasible modes of transportation. c Objective CIR 1-A: To provide specific programs and policies that address multi- modal transportation, multi -agency coordination, mitigation of traffic impacts and the balancing of land uses with transportation systems. ■ CIR-1A.11: Attempt to maintain or improve mobility within the City to achieve a standard levels of service not worse than Level of Service "D" at all intersection s under the sole control of the City. Intersection level of service analyses for General Plan conditions shall be updated periodically and presented to the City Council. • CIR-1A.12: Cooperate with adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or improve mobility within the City to achieve a standard level of service no worse than "D" at all intersections under State or joint control. Intersection level of service analyses for General Plan conditions for locations under State or joint control shall be updated periodically and presented to City Council. Goal CIR-2: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide for standard services levels at signalized intersections by constructing capacity improvements for all various models of circulation adopting land use intensities commensurate with planned circulation improvements and implementing traffic demand reduction programs, thereby creating a more energy efficient transportation system. o Objective CIR-2A: To coordinate efforts with other regional agencies and pursue operational improvements towards enhancing the capacity of the system of freeways and arterial highways in the City. • CIR-2A.1: Coordinate with Caltrans for future consideration of the extension of Route 55 (the Costa Mesa Freeway) from 191h Street to the southern City boundary. • CIR-2A.2: Coordinate with Orange County Transportation Authority and with adjacent agencies to improve signal timing and coordination along major arterials. 2 Q ■ CIR-2A.3: Continue to work with Caltrans to synchronize and coordinate traffic signals on arterials at intersections controlled by Caltrans. ■ CIR-2A.4: Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational improvements (medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization or phasing, parking or turn restrictions, etc.) to improve the efficiency of intersections. o Objective CIR 2-C: To invest capital via a rationally phased allocation process for implementing transportation projects and programs. ■ CIR-2C.2: Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for traffic services levels and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a priority list of improvement projects, with priorities based on 1) correcting identified hazards; 2) improving/maintaining peak hour traffic volumes; 3) improving efficiency of existing infrastructure utilization; and 4) intergovernmental coordination. Signal Synchronization The purpose of the Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) is to identify local and regional travel corridors within the City of Costa Mesa and develop a blue print for implementation of signal coordination along these corridors. The LSSP will include guidelines for synchronizing traffic signals based on equipment limitations, capacity restrictions and funding constraints. The traffic on arterials and highways in the region continues to increase with minimal change in capacity of the circulation system. This results in increased congestion and delay along important travel corridors in the City. Coordination of traffic signals along the travel corridors will increase the traffic -handling capacity of intersections thus reducing congestion and delay. Implementation of Signal Coordination along major arterials will provide the following benefits • Effectively manage the throughput capacity of intersections to improve mobility through the use of appropriate layouts and control measures and regular reviews and updates to the operational parameters; and • Reduce vehicle stops and delays, thereby: o lessening the negative impacts to air quality; and o reducing fuel consumption. Goals for near term and long range implementation The near term goal for the City is to upgrade the existing traffic signal infrastructure at intersections as well as at the Traffic Operation Center (TOC) and establish communication to all signalized intersections via fiber optic network_ Currently, the City is transitioning from an old signal system (equipment and communication) to a new system in which the traffic signal equipment at majority of the intersections will be at par with existing technology. Approximately, 80% of the intersections and the communication network in the City, will be updated in the next three years. The long term goal for the City is to develop a state-of-the-art TMC and a robust network of Closed Circuit Television (CCN) cameras. The implementation of these upgrades will provide the City with the necessary tools to identify traffic signal related issues quickly and address 3 them efficiently. It will also help in maintaining signal coordination along regional and local corridors. Infrastructure upgrades, modernization, and maintenance needs The City's signal synchronization plan includes various upgrades to infrastructure to support signal synchronization. The City's primary plan is to migrate from antiquated Multisonics 820 controllers and 330 master system equipment to modern ASC/3 signal controllers necessary to support updated timing plans and coordination. The City's signal controller equipment is no longer supported by the manufacturer so parts and repair are no longer available. Therefore, the City has started upgrading to ASC/3 signal controllers that utilizes the MIST system for master controller software. Additionally, the City has migrated away from utilizing twisted copper pair for communication between field controllers and the master system in City Hall and installed single mode fiber optic (SMFO) cable along major corridors. SMFO provides increased reliability and bandwidth necessary for communication with ASC/3 controllers and relaying CCTV signals. Modern controller equipment requires additional components within the signal cabinet and in the City's TOC, such as Ethernet switches and networking devices. Thus additional maintenance of these components is required to for increased reliability. Multi -jurisdictional coordination opportunities and initiatives Given the geographical location of the City of Costa Mesa, the system of highways and arterials in the region and the existing travel patterns create unique challenges for improving the overall mobility of the transportation system. The circulation network (including freeways) in the City carries a considerable amount of regional (through) traffic that does not originate or terminate within the City. As a result, the City has to regularly coordinate with the neighboring cities and other agencies such as Caltrans and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to maintain a smooth traffic flow on City arterials and highways. In the last three years, the City has partnered with several Cities and applied for Measure M funding for upgrading the traffic infrastructure and coordinating signals along regional corridors for the following projects. • Fairview Road (Newport Boulevard to SR -22) — City of Santa Ana • Adams Avenue (Beach Boulevard to Fairview Road) — City of Huntington Beach • Newport Boulevard (Via Lido to Bristol Street) — City of Newport Beach Additionally, last year the City partnered with Santa Ana and Newport Beach to prepare Measure M2 funding applications for two regional corridors, Harbor Boulevard (Newport Boulevard to SR -22) and Bristol Street (Newport Boulevard to SR -22). The City continuously monitors the traffic conditions along its arterials and highways to identify issue and develop innovative solutions to address them. Red Hill Avenue is a potential multi jurisdictional corridor that can be considered for signal synchronization in the future. Role of local system in regional context including consistency and participation in Project P The local signal synchronization plan for the City is consistent with the regional synchronization plan developed by OCTA. All the corridors included in the regional plan are part of the local 4 (9 plan. The regional synchronization plan includes the following corridors in the City of Costa Mesa. • Harbor Boulevard • Fairview Road • Bristol Street • Red Hill Avenue • Newport Boulevard • Baker Street • Placentia Avenue • Adams Avenue • Fair Drive • Victoria Street • 17th Street The local signal synchronization plan includes the corridors listed above and the following additional corridors within the City. • Bear Street • 19th Street • Sunflower Avenue • Anton Boulevard • Wilson Street Policies and strategies for updating signal timing The City has periodically undertaken updates to signal timing with goals of improving traffic flow and reducing delay. The established minimum timing of phases are derived from standards set forth in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The City has regularly refined and improved timing plans to adapt to current traffic patterns. The City has implemented traffic signal synchronization plans along major arterial corridors such as Harbor Boulevard and Fairview Road. Modern ASC/3 controllers and SMFO were deployed with these projects and existing timing and coordination plans were reviewed and revised to adhere to current standards. ASC/3 controllers also provide advanced timing features not available with 820 controllers. The City has taken advantage of these features to further improve traffic flow and reduce unnecessary delay. 5 11 SECTION TWO TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION STREET ROUTES (EXISTING AND PLANNED) 0 C O S T A M E S A FS inhGIA ` t Z Z 5YIL50N i' SANTA ANA a VICTORIA (S.A.. SA} ZHAMILTON G i a g z w Z 5 a (S -AA m a g m 91 9TH ppT (S.A.) [S A 1 MACARTHUR S A.1 (S.A) iSAI T z'n I M I BTH T.SCEMC BO a vii 3 W G F w Q ¢ m = SUNFLOWER c7 ¢ ¢ N.T.S. A 1 0 OLL CCURT J m LL 15.aJ SOUTHI COAST g �Rrsr TAD HUNTINGTON ctlu � °wA BEACH 'mss ; PuLi` Ta,„, �T .. ) w (IRVINE) GISLER y.N TMT ME]RO POW CTR DATE .. MxcnHnc« "or CALTRANS wnr FIBER LINK �utuEc PAMANNO ya ADAMS t+croroR •• eamn MESA VERDE -E ARLINGTO; MERRIMAC CC, FAIRGROUNDS FAIR CITY HALL ESTANGA NORTH% CEH i5 FS inhGIA ` t 90vm 5YIL50N i' VICTORIA ZHAMILTON G i a g BAY Z 5 a m a g 9TH ppT Talm T z'n I M I BTH HOSPITAL RD`s Occ-1. TRAFFIC SYNCHRONIZATION NETWORK 4 goy a kP KALMUS "F a�•5� G� '£9 IRVINE (COUNTY) (N, B ) NEWPORT BEACH LEGEND EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION (#) (� OTHER AGENCY SIGNALIZED NTERSECTION COSTA MESA COORDINATED CORRIDOR OTHER AGENCY COORDINATED CORRIDOR CITY OF COSTA MESA, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 'r SECTION THREE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVENTORY 0 CITY OF COSTA MESA SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION EQUIPMENT LIST Intersection Cabinetl Controller CCN Switch Type AM MD PM WK OP 1 PLACENTIA/16`h TypeP ASC 3 Fiber switch 100 FREE 100 90 90 2 PL4CENTIA/ 17'" Type ASC 3 Cahu Fiberswitch 100 FREE 100 90 90 3PLACENTIA/181h Type ASC3 Fiberswitch 100 FREE 100 90 90 a PIACENTIA/ 19`h TYPE P AS 3 Cohu Fiberswitch 100 FREE 100 90 90 5 PLACENTIA/ VICTORIA Type P ASC 3 Cohu Fiber switch/IP Capper 120 95 130 100 61 PLACENTIA / WILSON Type P ASC 3 Cohu IP Copper Free Free Free Free Free NTIAJESTANCIA SOUTH Type P ASC 3 IP Copper Free Free Free Free Free #71PLACIE ENTIA J ESTANCIA NORTH Type P ASC 3 IP Co per Free Free Free Free Free / MEYER Type M 820 NA 100 100 100 100 Free W VICTORIA/ AMERICAN Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 120 95 130 100 L1 SUPERIOR/ 16'/ INDUSTRIAL Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 2 SUPERIOR / 17T" Type P ASC 3 Cohu Analog Fiber switch Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans .3 VICTORIA/ VALLEY/PACIFIC Type P 820 Cohu Fiber switch 120 95 130 Free 100 A VICTORIA/ CANYON Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 120 95 130 Free 100 .31 VICTORIA/ NATIONAL Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 120 95 130 Free 100 61 VICTORIA/POMONA TypeP ASC3 Fiber Switch 120 95 130 Free 100 19T" /POMONA Type P 820 NA 100 100 100 100 Free J7.W W 19T" /ANAHEIM Type P 820 NA 1Do 100 100 100 Free W 19T" /PARK TypeP 820 NA Teri 100 100 100 Free HARBOR/ 19T" Type P ASC 3 IP Capper 130 110 130 110 100 i HARBOR J BAY Type P ASC 3 IP Copper 130110 130 110 100 t HARBOR/HAMILTON Type P ASC 3 IP Capper 130 1.) 130 110 100 3 HARBOR / VICTDRIA Type P ASC 3 Cohu Analog Gigabit/IP copper 130 110 130 110 100 HARBOR / WILSON Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 130 110 130 110 100 i HARBOR / HARBOR CENTER Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 130 110 Lsy 110 100 i HARBOR/ FAIR DRIVE Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 130 110 130 1 110 100 r HARBOR/ MERRIMAC Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 130 110 130 110 100 I HARBOR / MESA VERDE E./PETERSON Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 130 1 110 130 Ili 1 E 17T" /ORANGE Type P ASC 3 Cohu Fiber switch 90 90 90 90 NA 1 E 17T" / SANTA ANA Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 90 90 90 90 NA E 17" / TUSTIN Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 90 90 90 90 NA E 17T" /WESTMINSTER Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 90 90 90 90 NA BRISTOL SUNFLOWER Type 820 Gigabit/iPcopper 120 130 1 130 130 NA BRISTOL TOWN CENTER Type P 820 NA 120 130 130 130 NA BRISTOL / ANTONJ50 COAST PLAZA Type P 820 NA 120 130 130 130 NA BRISTOL/ 405 NB TypeP 170 NA Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans BRISTOL/405 SB {CALTRANSJ Type 170 NA Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans BRISTOL / HOTEL WAY Type P 820 NA120 130 130 130 NA BRISTOL / PAULARINO Type M 820 NA 120 130 130 130 NA BRISTOL/ BAKER Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 120 130 130 130 NA BRISTOL / RANDOLPH Type P 820 NA 80 80 80 80 80 BRISTOL/ BEAR Type M 820 NA 80 80 80 80 80 ANTON J PARK CENTER Type P 820 NA B.S. FREE 85 FREE FREE ANTON J AVE OF THE ARTS Type P 820 NA 85 FREE 85 FREE FREE BAKER / MENDOZA Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 85 85 85 8S 85 BAKER / BABB Type ASC 3 Fiber switch 85 85 85 85 85 BAKER J MILBRO Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 85 85 85 85 85 BAKER J BEAR Type ASC 3 Fiber switch 85 85 85 85 85 FAIR / FAIRGROLINDSICITY HALL TypeP 820 NAFree Free Free Free Free FAIR/VANGUARD Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free FAIR / LOYOLA Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free /FAIRVIEW/WILSON Type A5C3 Cohu Fiber switch Free Free Free Free Free FAIRVIEW / FAIR Type P ASC 3 Cohu Gigabit/Flber switch Ito 110 110 110 NA FAIRVIEW / MERRIMAC Type P ASC 3 1 Fiber switch 110 110 110 110 NA FAIRVIEW / ARLINGTON Type P A5C 3 Fiber switch 110 110 110 110 NA FAIRVIEW / OCC / CMHS ENTRANCE Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 110 110 110 110 NA FAIRVIEW / MONITOR Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 110 110 110 110 NA FAIRVIEW J ADAMS/ EL CAMINO Type P ASC 3 Cohu Analog Fiber switch 130 120 130 120 NA FAIRVIEW / BAKER Type P ASC 3 Cohu Fiber switch 130 120 130 1 120 NA FAIRVIEW I PAULARINO Type ASC3 Flberswitch 130 120 130 120 NA SOUTH COAST/SUSAN Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free SUNFLOWER J SUSAN Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free FAIRVIEW / SOUTH COAST Type P ASC 3 Cohu Fiber switch 130 120 130 120 NA FAIRVIEW SUNFLOWER ITypeP ASC3 Cohu Flberswitch 130 120 130 120 NA ADAMS /PINECREEK Type 1 820 NA 130 110 1 130 110 100 No. Intersection Cabinet Controller CCN Switch Type AM MD PM WK OP 66 HARBOR / ADAMS Type P ASC 3 Cohu Fiber switch 130 110 130 110 100 67 ,ADAMS / ROYAL PALM Type P 820 NA 130 110 130 110 100 68 ADAMS / MESA VERDE EAST Type P 820 NA 130 110 130 110 100 69 ADAMS / MESA VERDE W. / PLACENTIA Type P 820 Cohu Analog NA 130 110 130 110 100 70 ADAMS / ALBATROSS / SHANTAR Type P 820 NA 130 110 130 110 100 71 BAKER / COLLEGE Type P ASC 3 Fiber switch 130 110 130 110 100 72 HARBOR / BAKER Type P ASC 3 Gigabit 130 1 110 130 110 100 73 HARBOR / NUTMEG / TARGET TypeP ASC 3 Fiberswitch 130 110 130 110 100 74 HARBOR / GISLER TypeP ASC 3 Fiber switch 130 110 130 110 100 7S BAKER / ROYAL PALM TypeP ASC 3 Fiber switch Free Free Free Free Free r./ 77 •HARBOR /SOUTH COAST ryp. Type P ASC 3 it wNyer Fiber switch/IP Copper rree 130 I rree 110 rree 130 I rree 110 rree 100 781 HARBOR / LAW COURT Type P ASC 3 IP Copper 130 110 130 110 100 79 HARBOR / SUNFLOWER Type P ASC 3 IP Copper 130 110 130 110 100 80 HARBOR/SCENIC Type ASC3 IP Copper 130 110 130 110 100 81 SUNFLOWER/ WIMBLEDON/GREENVILLE Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 82 SUNFLOWER/ FUSCHIA/RAITT Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 83 SUNFLOWER / BEAR Type 1 820 IP Copper 105 105 105 105 105 84 SUNFLOWER / PLAZA Type P 820 IP Copper 105 105 105 105 105 85 SUNFLOWER / PARK CENTER Type P 820 NA 120 130 130 130 NA 86 SUNFLOWER / AVENUE OF THE ARTS Type P 820 NA 60 65 65 FREE NA 87SUNFLOWER/SAKIOKA/FLOWER Type 820 NA 120 130 130 130 NA 88 SUNFLOWER/ANTON Type 820 NA 120 130 130 130 NA 89 SUNFLOWER / HYLAND Type P 820 NA FREE FREE Free FREE FREE 90 iRED HILL/ KALMUS Type P 820 NA FREE FREE Free FREE FREE 91 RED HILL/ BAKER Type P ASC 3 IP Copper FREE FREE Free FREE FREE 92 RED HILL/ PAULARINO Type P 820 NA FREE FREE Free FREE FREE 93 BAKER / COOLIDGE Type M ASC 3 Fiber Switch 85 85 85 85 85 94 FAIRVIEW / MCCORMACK Type M ASC 3 Fiber Switch 130 120 130 120 NA 95 iBEAR J PAULARINO Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 96 BEAR J METRO POINT/MAY CO Type P 820 Cohu IP Copper 105 105 105 105 105 97 BEAR /SOUTH COAST Type P 820 IP Copper 105 105 105 105 105 98 BEAR / CRYSTAL COURT / SCP II Type P 820 IP Copper 105 105 105 105 105 99 :SOUTH COAST/ METRO WEST Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 100 :SOUTH COAST/ METRO EAST Type M 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 101 ANTON / SAKIOKA Type P 820 NA 85 FREE 85 FREE FREE 102 PAULARINO / JIAN WAY Type M 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 103 ANTON / EXPERIAN Type P 820 NA 85 FREE 85 FREE FREE 104 BAKER / FIRE STATION #2 Type M ASC 3 Fiber Switch 85 85 85 85 85 105 'WILSON / POMONA Type M 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 106 :SAKIOKA / ENCLAVE Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 107 BRISTOL/REDHILL 332 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 108BR15TOL/SBNEWPORT 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 109 BRISTOL/ NB NEWPORT 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 110 NEWPORT SB/MESA 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 111 NEWPORT N/B / MESA 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 112 NEWPORT SB FAIR 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 1131 NEWPORT NB / DEL MAR 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 114 NEWPORT SB /VANGUARD 332 820 NA 60 60 80 60 60 115 NEWPORT NB / SANTA ISABEL 332 820 NA 60 60 80 60 60 116 NEWPORT SB WILSON 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 117 NEWPORT NB / WILSON 332 820 NA 80 60 80 60 60 118 :NEWPORT SB/FAIRVI EW 332 820 NA 100 60 100 60 60 119 NEWPORT NB / 22"D Type P 820 Pelco Analog NA 100 60 100 60 60 120'NEWPORT SB/VICTORIA Type 820 NA 100 60 100 60 60 1-21 'NEWPORT NB /BAY 332 820 NA 60 60 80 60 60 122 NEWPORT SB/BAY 332 820 NA 60 60 80 60 60 123 VICTORIA /MAPLE Type P ASC 3 Fiber Switch 120 95 130 Free 100 124 WILSON/ CENTER WAY Type P 820 NA Free Free Free Free Free 125 HARBOR/ DATE Type P ASC 3 Fiber Switch 130 110 130 110 100 SECTION FOUR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM AND THREE YEAR PLAN 10 0 3 -YEAR OUTLOOK TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Constrained) Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: City of Costa Mesa MAINTENANCE PROJECT FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 TOTAL Traffic Signal Maintenance $355,000 $355,000 $360,000 $1,070,000 $364,000 $364,000 Bristol Street Signal Synchronization $581,520 $581,520 Harbor Boulevard Signal Synchronization $922,900 $922,900 Newport Boulevard Signal Synchronization $735,000 Subtotal Maintenance L $1,070,000 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 TOTAL Adams Avenue Signal Synchronization $364,000 $364,000 Bristol Street Signal Synchronization $581,520 $581,520 Harbor Boulevard Signal Synchronization $922,900 $922,900 Newport Boulevard Signal Synchronization $735,000 $735,000 Sunflower Avenue Signal Synchronization $727,274 $727,274 Subtotal Construction 1 $3,330,694 $3,330,694 OPERATIONS PROJECT FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 TOTAL Fairview Road Signal Synchronization $14,700 $14,700 $29,400 Baker/Placentia Signal Synchronization $15,599 $15,599 $15,599 $46,797 Victoria Street Signal Synchronization $5,680 $5,680 $5,680 $17,040 171h Street Signal Synchronization $5,710 $5,710 $5,710 $17,130 Subtotal Operations $41,689 $41,689 $26,989 $110,367 $4,511,061 3 -YEAR OUTLOOK TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Unconstrained) Reportina Jurisdiction Expenditures: City of Costa Mesa MAINTENANCE PROJECT FY14/15 FY15/16 I FY16/17 TOTAL Traffic Signal Maintenance $355,000 $355,000 $360,000 $1,070,000 TOTAL Bear Street Signal Synchronization $261,250 Cit wide Signal Improvements Hardware $250,000 Subtotal Maintenance $1,070,000 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 TOTAL Bear Street Signal Synchronization $261,250 Cit wide Signal Improvements Hardware $250,000 $250,000 Citywide ITS Improvements (Central sys_ CCTV) $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Signal System Upgrade (Paularino) $500,000 Traffic Management Center (Video Server -LF$60,000 Subtotal Construction $60,000 $1,011,250 $500,000 1 $500,000 OPERATIONS PROJECT FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 TOTAL -Citywide Signal Timing Maintenance $18,000 $20,000 $20,000 $58,000 Subtotal Opera $58,000 $1,628,000 12 @ LSSP IMPLEMENTATION - CANDIDATE SIGNAL SYNCHORNIZATION PROJECTS WITH ESTIMATED COSTS Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: Ciltv of Costa Mesa CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY-,.'.;. : ESTIMATED COST Bear Street Upgrade timing and replace controllers, cabinets, fiber optic cable and detection. $200,000 Anton Boulevard Upgrade timing and replace controllers, cabinet%, fiber optic cable and. d-o(w6on. $300,000 Wilson Street Upgrade timing rpd. �mntrollers, cabinets, fiber optic cable and detection. $80,000 1911, Street Signal synchronization $50,000 TMC Upgrades Central system software upgrade, Server, communication upgrades, and monitors $500,000 Red Hill Avenue Upgrade timing and replace controllers, cabinets, fiber optic cable and detection. $300,000 Total Estimated Cost $1,430,000 13 (3) SECTION FIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION ASSESSMENT REVIEW AND REVISE, AS MAY BE NECESSARY, THE TIMING OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS Significant timing plan updates and projects completed FY 2010/2011 through 2013/2014 14 @) Overall performance results. The completed TSS projects have yielded improvements in traffic flow during AM, midday, PM and weekend peak hours and generally reduced delay. Tangible benefits in the following areas have been documented. 1. Travel Time Savings — These savings apply to automobile, truck and transit passengers, who benefit from reduced costs according to their "value of time". 2. Fuel Consumption Savings — These are primarily the reduction in fuel consumption for all types of vehicles as a function of distance and time. 3. Vehicle Maintenance Savings — These are savings associated with the reduction in wear and tear on vehicles correlated to the reduction in number of stops. 4. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction — These are savings in Environmental related Health Costs due to reduction in greenhouse gases (CO2 emissions). The following corridor projects have been completed or in progress since January 2011 • Harbor Boulevard TSS Implementation Project (completed August 2011) o Upgrade timing, replace controllers, and install fiber optic cable. • Fairview Road TSSP (completed October 2013) o Upgrade timing, replace controllers, install fiber optic cable, and install CCTV cameras. • Baker Street TSSP (in progress) o Upgrade timing, replace controllers, and install fiber optic cable. • Placentia Avenue TSSP (in progress) o Upgrade timing, replace controllers, replace select cabinets, install fiber optic cable, and install CCTV cameras. • 17th Street TSSP (in progress) o Upgrade timing, replace controllers, install fiber optic cable, and install CCTV cameras. • Victoria Street TSSP (in progress) o Upgrade timing, replace controllers, install fiber optic cable, and install CCTV cameras. The performance results of Harbor Boulevard TSS and Fairview Road TSSP projects are attached. Additionally, the before studies for the 17th Street and Victoria Street projects are also attached_ City's approach and strategy for updating timing plans on a periodic basis. City staff reviews timing on an annual basis based on observed traffic patterns, traffic counts, and capital improvement projects that involve traffic signal upgrades or roadway widening. Hard copies of timing plans for all traffic signals are printed and archived once every year. Both basic timing parameters and coordination parameters are evaluated for 15 00 consistency with timing standards set forth in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The City is currently administering several infrastructure improvement projects where roadway widening is required. Timing plans for the affected intersections are evaluated with these projects since this typically involves roadway alignment changes and certain timing parameters must be revised to meet minimum guidelines. The City has started to implement several traffic signal synchronization projects where signal controllers are upgraded to implement updated timing plans. The City's overall master plan is to migrate away from antiquated equipment and concurrently review and update existing timing parameters. The City's overall plan is to implement revised timing along all major corridors through future cycles of Project P implementation. 16 9 Fairview Corridor Traffic Signal Synchronization Project- Final Report 5.4 CSPI Index Comparison OCTA developed Corridor Synchronization Performance Index (CSPI) to compare and prioritize corridors having different characteristics for signal synchronization. The index is obtained from data recorded during 'floating car' runs. A corridor is scored based on recorded travel parameters including average speed, number of greens made vs. number of reds stopped, and stops per mile. The sum of the scores from each of the categories gives the total of the index. A 70 is considered the baseline for good operational performance. CSPI value ranging between 50 to 69 indicates a problem generally fixable with a low cost solutions or signal timing modification. A CSPI below 50 however, indicates a poor corridor performance thereby necessitating larger scale investigation into corridor operations. Table 5.3 and Table 5.4 provide direction -wise CSPI for 'Before' and 'After' conditions respectively for AM, Mid -Day, PM and Weekend Peak periods. Table 5.4 CSPI for'After' Study Conditions I ame o.S l. -to rI Tor -beTore' blEuay t onanionS MD AM Peak MD Peak PM Peak Weekend Peak Parameters Avg Speed (mph) NB 23.8 SIB 25.1 NB 25.1 SIB 25.8 NB 19.4 SIB NB SIB 23.1 23.7 23.7 and (CSPI) (20.7 22.6) (22.7) 23.8) (14.1) (19.7) (20.5) (20.6) Greens per Red 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.1 1.3 1.5 2.0 1.4 and (CSPI) 12.5) (13.8) (17.7) 1 (16.9) 10.4) (12.3) (15.9) (11.5) Stops per Mile 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.5 and (CSPI) 25.4 25.3 (28.4) (28.4 21.1 25.6) 27.2) 25.1) Total CSPI 58.5 61.7 68.8 69.1 45.6 57.6 63.6 57.2 CSPI Tier IV III III III V IV III IV Table 5.4 CSPI for'After' Study Conditions ADVANTEC Consulting Engineers_ 20 October 2013 gZ AM Peak MD Peak SB 30.4 30.6) PM NB 21.1 (16.7) Peak SIB 25.2 22.8) Weekend NB 26.6 24.8) Peak SIB 26.7 25.1) Parameters NB SIB NB Avg Speed (mph) 27.4 25.9 29.7 and (CSPI) 26.11 23.9) 29.5) Greens per Red and (CSPI) 2.4 19.2) 2.4 (19.2) 3.7 (29.7) 3.6 (28.8) 1.7 13.6 2.4 19.0) 2.6 20.6 2.5 (19.8) Stops per Mile and (CSPI) 1.1 (28.2) 1.2 28.2) 0.8 (32.4) 0.8 (31.5) 1.5 (24.6) 1.1 (29.1) 1.1 (29.3) 1.1 (29.3) Total CSPI 73.9 1 71.2 91.6 90.8 54.9 71.0 74.7 74.2 CSPI Tier II 1 II 1 1 IV II II II ADVANTEC Consulting Engineers_ 20 October 2013 gZ Costa Mesa 17th Street and Victoria Street TSS Project Before Study Technical Memorandum A summary of OCTA CSPI for the "before" field travel time studies along the 171h and Victoria Street corridors are shown in Table 3.11 and Table 3.12. TABLE 3.11: "BEFORE" STUDY CSPI SUMMARY -17TH STREET CORRIDOR TABLE 3.12. "BEFORE" STUDY CSPI SUMMARY -VICTORIA STREET CORRIDOR AM Peak EB WB MD Peak EB WB Off Peak EB WB PM Peak EBF WB Saturday Peak EB WB Parameters Value Score Value I Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Avg Speed 20.99 16.50 16.90 110.70. 19.00 13.60 15.56 08.08 17.53 11.50 15.00 08.00 19.32 14.10 15.00 08.00 15.11 08.10 16.06 09.50 Green/Red 01.23 09.90 01.07 08.50 01.17 09.30 01.00 08.00 01.00 08.00 01.00 08.00 01.07 08-50..01.17 01.58 124.20 09.30 01.00 08.00 01.00 08.00 Stops per Mile CSPI CSPI Tier 02.30 17.00 43.30 Tier 5 02.30 17.00 36.20 Tier 5 02.30 117.00 39.90 Tier 5. 02.30 17.00 33.80 Tier 5 02.30 17.00 36.50 Tier 5 02.3Q 17.Q0 33.00 Tier 5 02.30 117.00 39.60 Tier 5 02.30 17.00 34.30 1 Tier 5 02.30 17.00 33.10 Tier 5 02.30 117.00 34.50 Tier 5 TABLE 3.12. "BEFORE" STUDY CSPI SUMMARY -VICTORIA STREET CORRIDOR Page 10 AM Peak MD Peak Off EB Peak_` _ WB t__ _ PM EB Peak WB Saturday EB Peak WB EB WB EB WS Parameters Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Avg Speed 24.25 21.40 30.13 130.20 26.78 25.20 27.17 25.80 26.02 24.00 22.73 19.10 31.96 32.90 20.86 16.30 22.71 19.10 22.32 18.50 Green/Red 01.92 1S.30 04.00 32.00 02.06 16.40 02.61 20.90 02.06 16.40 01.06 08.40 05.00 40.00 01.92 15.30 02.00 16.00 01.58 12.70 Stops per Mile 01.59 24.10 00.75 32.50 01.25 127.50 01.12 128.80 01.25 27.50 01.87 21.30 00.75 32.50 01.58 24.20 01.30 127.00 01.58 124.20 CSPI 60.80 94.70 69.10 75.40 68.00 48.80 105.40 55.80 62.00 55.30 CSPI Grade Tier 3 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 5 Tier 1 Tier 4 Tier 37 Tier 4 Page 10 TSS Implementation Project HARBOR BOULEVARD: AM NORTHBOUND (Before and After) Newport Blvd/SR-55 to Scenic Ave/Lake Center Dr Overall Output Statistics Study Name: Harbor-AWNB Study Date : 6/20/2011 Page No. : 3 Node Length Node Name Travel # of Avg Total Time <= Time <= Time <_ # Time Stops Speed Delay 0 MPH 35 MPH 55 MPH 1 0 Newport Blvd/SR-55 2 861 19th St Before 41.6 0.6 14.1 266 13.0 41.6 41.6 After 41.2 0.4 14.2 262 12.6 408 41.2 Chance 1 -0.4 -0.2 1 0.1 -0.4 -0.4 1 -0.8 -0.4 3 1997 Bay St Before 35.8 0.0 38.0 1.0 0.0 6.8 35.8 After 46.4 0.4 29.3 12.0 6.0 182 46.4 Chane 10.6 0.4 7 11.0 6.0 11.4 10.6 4 677 Hamilton St Before 25.8 0.6 17.9 142 7.6 194 25.8 After 13.0 0.0 35.5 1.4 0.0 5.8 13 0 Chan a -12,8 -0.6 17.6 -12.8 -7.6 -13.6 -128 5 639 Victoria St Before 19.8 0.4 22.0 8.8 08 16 8 19.8 After 46.2 0.6 9.4 34.8 27.6 41.6 46.2 Chane 26.4 02 -12.6 26.0 26.8 24.8 26.4 6 1336 Wilson St Before 240 0.0 38.0 1 2 00 4.8 24.0 After 23.2 0.0 39.3 0.6 0.0 24 23.2 Chan a -0.8 0.0 1.3 -0.6 0.0 -2.4 -0.8 7 1011 Harbor Ctr Before 170 0.0 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 After 162 0.0 42.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 162 Change -0.8 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -08 8 1539 Fair Dr Before 26.4 0.0 39.7 0.4 00 4.2 26.4 After 24.6 0.0 42.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.6 Chance -1.8 0.0 2.9 -0.4 0.0 -4.2 -1,8 9 1868 Merrimac Way Before 61.0 1.0 20.9 29.0 12.8 43.4 61.0 After 29.4 0.0 43.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 Change -31.6 -1.0 22.4 -29.0 -12.8 -43.4 -31.6 10 753 Mesa Verde Before 15.6 0.0 32 9 2.2 0.0 8.8 15.6 After 12.0 0.0 42.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Chance -3.6 0.0 9.9 -2.2 0.0 -8,8 -3.6 11 1049 Adams Ave Before 19.2 0.0 373 1.0 0.0 3.0 19.2 After 490 0.4 14.6 31.8 27.0 35.2 49.0 Chane 29.8 0.4 -22.7 30.8 27.0 1 32.2 29.8 12 2448 Baker St Before 43.6 0.0 38.3 2.6 0.0 6.8 43.6 After 53.0 0.2 31.5 11.0 5.4 22.6 53.0 Chane 9.4 0.2 -6.8 8.4 5.4 15.8 9.4 13 690 Nutmeg PI Before 12.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 After 16.4 0.2 28.7 4.0 0.0 11.6 16.4 Change 4.4 0.2 -10.5 4.0 0.0 11.6 4.4 14 1838 Gisler Ave Before 65.2 1.0 19.2 33.4 19.2 47.0 65.2 After 64.4 0.8 19.5 33.4 21.6 42.8 64.4 Chan a -0.8 -0.2 02 0.0 2.4 -42 -0.8 15 374 1-405 SB Ramps Before 11.2 0.2 22.8 4.6 0.0 9.4 11.2 After 9.0 0.2 28.3 2.4 0.0 7.8 9.0 Chan a -2-2 0.0 5.6 -22 0.0 -1.6 -22 16 826 1-405 NB Ramps Before 15.8 0.0 35.6 1.6 0.0 5.4 15.8 After 20.8 0.0 27.1 6.8 4.4 10.4 20.8 Chane 5.0 0.0 -8.6 5.2 4.4 5.0 5.0 17 476 South Coast Dr Before 8.8 0.0 36.9 0.6 0.0 3.6 8.8 After 8.8 0.0 36.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 8.8 Chane O.D QO 0.0 -0 6 .0 -2-8 0.0 18 757 Law Crt Before 13.4 0.0 38.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 13,4 After 13.2 0.0 39.1 0.4 0.0 1.8 13.2 Chance -0.2 0.0 0.6 0.4 .0 1.4 -0.2 19 691 Sunflower Ave Before 11 4 0.0 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 After 20.4 0.4 23.1 8.2 2.0 16.0 204 Chane 9.0 0.4 -18.2 8.2 2.0 16.0 9.0 20 1305 Scenic Ave/Lake Center Before 19.8 0.0 44,9 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 After 22.0 0.0 40.4 0.6 0.0 2.0 21.0 Chane 2.2 -4 5 0.6 .2 Totals 21,135 Before 487.43.8 29.6 127.2 53.4 221.4 486.4 After 529.2 3.6 1 27.2 173.6 106.6 1 259.8 1 528.2 Chane 41.8 -0.2 -2.3 46.4 53.2 38.4 41.8 Stats based on 5 BEFORE runs & 5 AFTER runs. Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH, Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 40 MPH.